Difference between revisions of "Props 2010/24/"
Truekahuna (talk | contribs) |
Truekahuna (talk | contribs) (→Analysis) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
== Analysis == | == Analysis == | ||
| − | As part of the back-room dealings for the 2009 budget, conservatives in the Senate and Assembly were given yet another tax break for Big Corporate Money that will take effect next year. | + | As part of the back-room dealings for the 2009 budget, conservatives in the Senate and Assembly were given yet another tax break for Big Corporate Money that will take effect next year. That, and Proposition 24, leaves we Greens and Progressives with what might be ''the biggest no-brainer of this election'': why should large multi-state corporations, who already do not contribute their fair share (and who pay less tax as percentage of their income than the average working family or small business owner), get still more favorable tax treatment from Sacramento? |
| − | + | The opponents of this measure will argue with one thing: jobs. Listen closely and you can hear their steady chant of "job killer, be afraid, job killer, be afraid". They will scream and rant about how California will lose this many or that many jobs because corporations must share with all of us the odious burden of actually funding our state and local government. Of course, no mention will be made that economists (at least those not hired by big business) all agree that tax cuts are the absolute ''worst'' way to create jobs; infrastructure spending (i.e. schools and bridges and highways) is by far more stimulative to the economy and create far more jobs than giving Bank Of America a lighter tax bill. | |
| − | + | And opponents will also scream "But corporations will abandon California". To that we Progressives ask bluntly, "and your point would be...?". ''None'' of these tax laws, if We The People allow them to take effect, are going to help small business. So, how is it a bad thing if some locally-owned hardware store or grocer (whose owners pay their fair share) gets to play the game on level ground because Home Depot or Trader Joe's actually have to pay their taxes? | |
| − | + | Nobody likes taxes. But everybody has to contribute their fair share and spread the "pain". We do not need the rich and powerful skipping out through more accounting tricks that they get and we don't. Vote "Yes" on Proposition 24. | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
== Comments == | == Comments == | ||
Revision as of 17:32, 25 July 2010
PROPOSITION 24 -- CORPORATE TAXES
Repeals recent legislation which lowered corporate taxes by allowing businesses to shift operating losses to prior tax years; expanding the time in which losses can be shifted; allowing businesses to share tax credits with affiliated corporations; and allowing multi-state companies to use a sales-based income calculation rather than one based on property, payroll, and sales. Major funding support provided by California Teachers Association ($2.2 million). Major opposition funding provided by Fox Group, Time Warner, CBS, General Electric, Cisco Systems, Amgen, Walt Disney Company, and Genentech, Inc.
Proposed GPCA Position
GPCA urges a "Yes" vote on this matter
Analysis
As part of the back-room dealings for the 2009 budget, conservatives in the Senate and Assembly were given yet another tax break for Big Corporate Money that will take effect next year. That, and Proposition 24, leaves we Greens and Progressives with what might be the biggest no-brainer of this election: why should large multi-state corporations, who already do not contribute their fair share (and who pay less tax as percentage of their income than the average working family or small business owner), get still more favorable tax treatment from Sacramento?
The opponents of this measure will argue with one thing: jobs. Listen closely and you can hear their steady chant of "job killer, be afraid, job killer, be afraid". They will scream and rant about how California will lose this many or that many jobs because corporations must share with all of us the odious burden of actually funding our state and local government. Of course, no mention will be made that economists (at least those not hired by big business) all agree that tax cuts are the absolute worst way to create jobs; infrastructure spending (i.e. schools and bridges and highways) is by far more stimulative to the economy and create far more jobs than giving Bank Of America a lighter tax bill.
And opponents will also scream "But corporations will abandon California". To that we Progressives ask bluntly, "and your point would be...?". None of these tax laws, if We The People allow them to take effect, are going to help small business. So, how is it a bad thing if some locally-owned hardware store or grocer (whose owners pay their fair share) gets to play the game on level ground because Home Depot or Trader Joe's actually have to pay their taxes?
Nobody likes taxes. But everybody has to contribute their fair share and spread the "pain". We do not need the rich and powerful skipping out through more accounting tricks that they get and we don't. Vote "Yes" on Proposition 24.
Comments
Please place all commentary into the Discussion page.
Return to Props_2010/
