Difference between revisions of "Draft GPUS Platform Amendment Measuring Economic Progress"
Garyruskin (talk | contribs) |
Garyruskin (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
'''OUR POSITION: ONE SENTENCE.''' | '''OUR POSITION: ONE SENTENCE.''' | ||
| − | Economic growth has been the principal goal of American economic policy. Most mainstream economists advocate a theory of unlimited economic growth arising from technological progress and other gains in productivity. Such theories ignore the limits to growth imposed by the laws of physics | + | Economic growth has been the principal goal of American economic policy. Most mainstream economists advocate a theory of unlimited economic growth arising from technological progress and other gains in productivity. Such theories ignore the limits to growth imposed by the laws of physics and ecology, and the carrying capacity of the Earth. |
American economic growth is having negative effects on the long-term ecological and economic welfare of the United States and the world. There is a fundamental conflict between economic growth and ecological health (for example, biodiversity conservation, clean air and water, atmospheric stability). | American economic growth is having negative effects on the long-term ecological and economic welfare of the United States and the world. There is a fundamental conflict between economic growth and ecological health (for example, biodiversity conservation, clean air and water, atmospheric stability). | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
'''GREEN SOLUTIONS''' | '''GREEN SOLUTIONS''' | ||
| − | 1. | + | 1. Oppose the use of Gross Domestic Product as the principal measure of the heath of the U.S. economy. The most viable and sustainable alternative is a steady-state economy. A steady-state economy has a stable or mildly fluctuating product of population and per capita consumption, and is generally indicated by stable or mildly fluctuating GDP. The steady-state economy has become a more appropriate goal than economic growth in the United States and other large, wealthy economies. A steady-state economy precludes ever-expanding production and consumption of goods and services. However, a steady-state economy does not preclude economic development – a qualitative process not gauged by GDP growth and other measures that overlook ecological effects. |
| − | 2. | + | 2. Support more complete measures of economic progress that incorporate the value of non-monetary goods and services as well other key social indicators such as infant mortality, life expectancy of people, educational opportunities offered by the state, family stability, environmental data, and health care for all people. Another measure is to quantify human benefit (in terms of education, health care, elder care, etc.) provided by each unit of output. Measuring the gap between the most fortunate and the least fortunate in our society, for example, tells us how well or poorly we are doing in creating an economy that does not benefit some at the expense of others. |
| − | 3. For many nations with widespread poverty, increasing per capita consumption (through economic growth or through more equitable distributions of wealth) remains an appropriate goal. Ultimately, however, the global ecosystem will not be able to support further economic growth. | + | 3. Support a more equitable distribution of wealth among nations, and within nations, as part of efforts to reach a global steady-state economy. For many nations with widespread poverty, increasing per capita consumption (through economic growth or through more equitable distributions of wealth) remains an appropriate goal. Ultimately, however, the global ecosystem will not be able to support further economic growth. A global economy with inequitable wealth distribution is far more likely to generate continual international strife and conflict. Such strife and conflict, in turn, ensures the economic unsustainability of some nations and threatens the economic sustainability of all. |
---- | ---- | ||
Revision as of 18:13, 7 April 2010
SECTION TITLE: MEASURING ECONOMIC PROGRESS
SECTION SUBTITLE: Improving the measure of our economy
OUR POSITION: ONE SENTENCE.
Economic growth has been the principal goal of American economic policy. Most mainstream economists advocate a theory of unlimited economic growth arising from technological progress and other gains in productivity. Such theories ignore the limits to growth imposed by the laws of physics and ecology, and the carrying capacity of the Earth.
American economic growth is having negative effects on the long-term ecological and economic welfare of the United States and the world. There is a fundamental conflict between economic growth and ecological health (for example, biodiversity conservation, clean air and water, atmospheric stability).
We cannot rely on the hope of technological progress to solve ecological and long-term economic problems. Rather, we must make lifestyle choices that reinforce a general equilibrium of humans with nature. This requires consciously choosing to foster green technologies, whether they are new or old, rather than those conducive to conspicuous consumption and waste.
GREEN SOLUTIONS
1. Oppose the use of Gross Domestic Product as the principal measure of the heath of the U.S. economy. The most viable and sustainable alternative is a steady-state economy. A steady-state economy has a stable or mildly fluctuating product of population and per capita consumption, and is generally indicated by stable or mildly fluctuating GDP. The steady-state economy has become a more appropriate goal than economic growth in the United States and other large, wealthy economies. A steady-state economy precludes ever-expanding production and consumption of goods and services. However, a steady-state economy does not preclude economic development – a qualitative process not gauged by GDP growth and other measures that overlook ecological effects.
2. Support more complete measures of economic progress that incorporate the value of non-monetary goods and services as well other key social indicators such as infant mortality, life expectancy of people, educational opportunities offered by the state, family stability, environmental data, and health care for all people. Another measure is to quantify human benefit (in terms of education, health care, elder care, etc.) provided by each unit of output. Measuring the gap between the most fortunate and the least fortunate in our society, for example, tells us how well or poorly we are doing in creating an economy that does not benefit some at the expense of others.
3. Support a more equitable distribution of wealth among nations, and within nations, as part of efforts to reach a global steady-state economy. For many nations with widespread poverty, increasing per capita consumption (through economic growth or through more equitable distributions of wealth) remains an appropriate goal. Ultimately, however, the global ecosystem will not be able to support further economic growth. A global economy with inequitable wealth distribution is far more likely to generate continual international strife and conflict. Such strife and conflict, in turn, ensures the economic unsustainability of some nations and threatens the economic sustainability of all.
2004 PLATFORM ON MEASURING ECONOMIC PROGRESS
Economic growth has been a primary goal of American policy. Corporations, politicians beholden to corporations, and economists funded by corporations advocate a theory of unlimited economic growth stemming from technological progress. Based upon established principles of the physical and biological sciences, however, there is a limit to economic growth.
American economic growth is having negative effects on the long-term ecological and economic welfare of the United States and the world. There is a fundamental conflict between economic growth and ecological health (for example, biodiversity conservation, clean air and water, atmospheric stability).
We cannot rely on technological progress to solve ecological and long-term economic problems. Rather, we should endeavor to make lifestyle choices that reinforce a general equilibrium of humans with nature. This requires consciously choosing to foster environmentally sound technologies, whether they are newer or older technologies, rather than technologies conducive to conspicuous consumption and waste.
1. Economic growth, as gauged by increasing Gross Domestic Product (GDP), is a dangerous and anachronistic American goal. The most viable and sustainable alternative is a steady-state economy. A steady-state economy has a stable or mildly fluctuating product of population and per capita consumption, and is generally indicated by stable or mildly fluctuating GDP. The steady-state economy has become a more appropriate goal than economic growth in the United States and other large, wealthy economies. A steady-state economy precludes ever-expanding production and consumption of goods and services. However, a steady-state economy does not preclude economic development – a qualitative process not gauged by GDP growth and other measures that overlook ecological effects.
2. One way to measure the economy is to assess the value of non-monetary goods and services and measure the rate of infant mortality, life expectancy of people, educational opportunities offered by the state, family stability, environmental data, and health care for all people. Another measure is to quantify human benefit (in terms of education, health care, elder care, etc.) provided by each unit of output. Measuring the gap between the most fortunate and the least fortunate in our society, for example, tells us how well or poorly we are doing in creating an economy that does not benefit some at the expense of others.
3. For many nations with widespread poverty, increasing per capita consumption (through economic growth or through more equitable distributions of wealth) remains an appropriate goal. Ultimately, however, the global ecosystem will not be able to support further economic growth. Therefore, an equitable distribution of wealth among nations is required to maintain a global steady-state economy. A global economy with inequitable wealth distribution will be subject to continual international strife and conflict. Such strife and conflict, in turn, ensures the economic unsustainability of some nations and threatens the economic sustainability of all.
