Difference between revisions of "Props 2010/18/"
Truekahuna (talk | contribs) (→Recommended Position) |
(→Argument) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
''Authorizes $11.14 billion in bonds for state water projects, including storage, conservation, groundwater protection, and recycling. Major funding support from Gov. Schwarzenegger's California Dream Team (ballot measure committee), Conservation Action Fund, and California Alliance for Jobs (a group including Associated General Contractors,Operating Engineers, Carpenters Union, and Association of Engineering Construction Employers). Major opposition funding from Change To Win Federation, Food and Water Watch, The Nature Conservancy, California State Parks Foundation, Planning and Conservation League, and National Audubon Society.'' | ''Authorizes $11.14 billion in bonds for state water projects, including storage, conservation, groundwater protection, and recycling. Major funding support from Gov. Schwarzenegger's California Dream Team (ballot measure committee), Conservation Action Fund, and California Alliance for Jobs (a group including Associated General Contractors,Operating Engineers, Carpenters Union, and Association of Engineering Construction Employers). Major opposition funding from Change To Win Federation, Food and Water Watch, The Nature Conservancy, California State Parks Foundation, Planning and Conservation League, and National Audubon Society.'' | ||
---- | ---- | ||
− | + | The political solution for rational and sound water planning lies in structural reforms that establish bio-regional entities that represent stakeholders in the decision-making process. Such a solution would inherently impact on the character of water diversions that we have seen in the past and provide a new political landscape for Greens running for political office. | |
+ | |||
+ | Green Party candidates, who come forward in the next election cycle, need to oppose the bond issue, promote regional water planning and oppose continued diversions from one region of California to another. Greens running for the State Legislature can develop campaign strategies that focus on the environmental and budgetary issues around the theft of funds for education, the reckless spending for favored agri-business interests and the failure to end multi-billion dollar diversions without recognition of the needs of the regions impacted. Prioritization needs to be based on documented and consensual processes, not on back room deals made in the dead of night. | ||
+ | |||
+ | California state government has failed to provide real solutions for water and public education. The Green Party is willing to break from the failures of past policies and promote reforms that are long overdue. | ||
+ | |||
+ | New support for the Green Party will develop based on our willingness NOT to repeat the hollow rhetoric of the Democrats and the Republicans. Too many times they have showed their true colors. It is time for advocacy groups to come forward and unions and other political action groups to step forward and support Green campaigns through financial support and to step forward in building and creating a new agenda for California. | ||
+ | |||
+ | We have worked often with environmental groups, Constitutional reform groups, student groups, teachers groups and other political organizations. We have contributed to their efforts and continue to do so. But reforms will not happen without the representation in there willing to make it happen. | ||
+ | |||
+ | In water there is no step backwards. Opposing the bond issue, as many environmental groups already have, is one step forward. The group RESTORE THE DELTA has been actively engaged in organizing based on the concerns of regional stakeholders. They have steadfastly opposed the water agreement when it was in the state legislature. It circulated a petition along with 23 other environmental groups stipulating: | ||
+ | |||
+ | First, I oppose the creation of a Delta Council on which the Delta would only have one representative. Second, I oppose the authority the Council would have over all quality of life issues in the Delta as it would have the right to override approval of local agencies for all local projects. Third, I oppose the intent of the bill "authorization of new conveyance" as this would offer a new layer of super protection for the outcome of the Bay Delta Conservation Plan. Fourth, I oppose the idea that protecting the Delta, fisheries and communities alike, can be set as a co-equal goal with water exports to another region in California, all at a loss to the Delta's ecosystem and economy. And last, I oppose a general obligation water bond or bonds that will fund infrastructure and programs that will not restore the Delta, regardless of whether these bonds are offered as one large package or in future bond cycles. | ||
+ | http://citizenspeak.org/node/1780 | ||
== Recommended Position == | == Recommended Position == | ||
The Green Party of California recommends a Yes/No vote. | The Green Party of California recommends a Yes/No vote. |
Revision as of 18:32, 17 July 2010
PROPOSITION 18 -- WATER BOND
Authorizes $11.14 billion in bonds for state water projects, including storage, conservation, groundwater protection, and recycling. Major funding support from Gov. Schwarzenegger's California Dream Team (ballot measure committee), Conservation Action Fund, and California Alliance for Jobs (a group including Associated General Contractors,Operating Engineers, Carpenters Union, and Association of Engineering Construction Employers). Major opposition funding from Change To Win Federation, Food and Water Watch, The Nature Conservancy, California State Parks Foundation, Planning and Conservation League, and National Audubon Society.
The political solution for rational and sound water planning lies in structural reforms that establish bio-regional entities that represent stakeholders in the decision-making process. Such a solution would inherently impact on the character of water diversions that we have seen in the past and provide a new political landscape for Greens running for political office.
Green Party candidates, who come forward in the next election cycle, need to oppose the bond issue, promote regional water planning and oppose continued diversions from one region of California to another. Greens running for the State Legislature can develop campaign strategies that focus on the environmental and budgetary issues around the theft of funds for education, the reckless spending for favored agri-business interests and the failure to end multi-billion dollar diversions without recognition of the needs of the regions impacted. Prioritization needs to be based on documented and consensual processes, not on back room deals made in the dead of night.
California state government has failed to provide real solutions for water and public education. The Green Party is willing to break from the failures of past policies and promote reforms that are long overdue.
New support for the Green Party will develop based on our willingness NOT to repeat the hollow rhetoric of the Democrats and the Republicans. Too many times they have showed their true colors. It is time for advocacy groups to come forward and unions and other political action groups to step forward and support Green campaigns through financial support and to step forward in building and creating a new agenda for California.
We have worked often with environmental groups, Constitutional reform groups, student groups, teachers groups and other political organizations. We have contributed to their efforts and continue to do so. But reforms will not happen without the representation in there willing to make it happen.
In water there is no step backwards. Opposing the bond issue, as many environmental groups already have, is one step forward. The group RESTORE THE DELTA has been actively engaged in organizing based on the concerns of regional stakeholders. They have steadfastly opposed the water agreement when it was in the state legislature. It circulated a petition along with 23 other environmental groups stipulating:
First, I oppose the creation of a Delta Council on which the Delta would only have one representative. Second, I oppose the authority the Council would have over all quality of life issues in the Delta as it would have the right to override approval of local agencies for all local projects. Third, I oppose the intent of the bill "authorization of new conveyance" as this would offer a new layer of super protection for the outcome of the Bay Delta Conservation Plan. Fourth, I oppose the idea that protecting the Delta, fisheries and communities alike, can be set as a co-equal goal with water exports to another region in California, all at a loss to the Delta's ecosystem and economy. And last, I oppose a general obligation water bond or bonds that will fund infrastructure and programs that will not restore the Delta, regardless of whether these bonds are offered as one large package or in future bond cycles. http://citizenspeak.org/node/1780
Recommended Position
The Green Party of California recommends a Yes/No vote.